The authorities determined that the submitted evidence was insufficient to establish that workplace bullying had occurred.
He claimed this amounted to workplace bullying, which led him to file the complaint with the MOEL.
However,ADORmaintained that the companys actions were justified.
No illegal detention or coercion occurred during this process.
Previous Workplace Bullying Allegations Also Dismissed
This is the third workplace bullying case involvingADORthat has ended without charges.
Another case involved formerADORVice President L, who filed a workplace bullying complaint againstHYBEexecutives last September.
L claimed thatHYBEconducted a forced internal audit and seized company assets without consent.
However, after a detailed investigation, the authorities ruled in favor ofHYBEand closed the case without charges.
However, the authorities determined thatHannidoes not qualify as an employee under the Labor Standards Act.
SEE ALSO:Press conference held over sexual assault allegations against 143 Entertainment CEO
