He explained, “The termination’s validity depends on whether there is a material breach of the contract.
None of NewJeans' claims appear to meet these criteria.
Instead, NewJeans may end up being liable for damages to ADOR.
Most lawyers agree that termination is unlikely, and I share this view.
This means NewJeans' termination notice might hold legal weight.
If mutual blame is established, termination penalties for both parties could be reduced to zero.
NewJeans' actions were strategic and decisive.
Intellectual property disputes over imitating their work are unlikely to justify contract termination either.
Courts rarely grant full damages in such cases, often significantly reducing the amounts owed.”
If this goes to trial, the outcome may not favor NewJeans.
It is unlikely that NewJeans will be able to continue using their current group name."
Common cases include delayed settlements or insufficient management.
If NewJeans is actively promoting and ADOR is fulfilling its duties, it will be hard to justify termination.
Termination penalties listed in the contract may be reduced at the judge’s discretion."
The key issue lies in whether there is evidence of ADOR violating the terms of the exclusive contract.
If NewJeans continues their activities after declaring the termination of their exclusive contract, copyright-related disputes could arise.
Determining how to settle the compensation for their activities would also be a complex matter.
Without clear proof, it will be hard to argue that these constitute breaches of contract.
SEE ALSO:Team Bunnies updates on legal action against malicious posts targeting NewJeans
