518
TheNational Assemblyhas proposed new amendments that could significantly impact the K-pop industry.
“Does it make sense to cut off and limit working hours just based on age?
Anyone who takes a closer look at how the industry operates would immediately see how unrealistic this is.
The controversy stems from the revision that further subdivides working hour limits for young entertainers.
In K-pop, younger idol groups are currently leading the wave of popularity.
The system involves casting young talents who undergo rigorous training as agency trainees before debuting.
An agency official lamented,“It’s not like we release new songs and promote all year round.
They added,“Even filming in-house content takes up to 10 hours.
Music videos are already shot over two to three days to comply with existing regulations.
This ultimately affects the members' earnings.
Who is this really for?”
The financial burden is expected to hit smaller agencies the hardest.
Concerns about reverse discrimination also arise, as idol groups operate as a unit, making age-based restrictions problematic.
Agencies are also striving to support health and education.
While we fully support the intention to protect young artists, the bill lacks practicality.
Even the artists themselves don’t see this as ‘care,’ but as an ‘age cut.’
Its essential to consider the realities and listen to the voices involved.”
What are your thoughts?
SEE ALSO:Highlight reclaims their name and releases music as BEAST (B2ST) after 9 years
